Monday, November 13, 2017

CRISPR, part 1

I'm not gonna lie, very late. This is also not it all. There will be more on CRISPR later.

CRISPR is an acronym for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat. CRISPR refers to somewhat palindromic sequences of DNA in microorganisms that are essential in their immune systems. How they work is by cutting up any intruding viruses. They can detect what to kill through stored memories of the genomes of viruses, stored in areas of CRISPRs known as spacers. If the virus genome doesn’t exist as a spacer already, it becomes one.
There are essentially three steps, then, to the CRISPR immune system:
  1. New virus adaptation: the creation of a new spacer to ‘adapt’ to a new virus or cellular invader.
  2. Production of CRISPR RNAs: the copying of the spacers from DNA into RNA, single chain versus the typical double chain DNA
  3. RNA guided virus fighting: CRISPR RNAs guide bacterial tools to seek and kill viruses.

That’s all fine and dandy for bacteria, but what’s in it for us? Why’s it become such a controversy lately?

Here are some applications of CRISPR:
Industrial: CRISPR was originally discovered in the bacteria Streptococcus thermophilus by the company Danisco. It was discovered that S. thermophilus was equipped with CRISPR sequences allowing it to be immune to certain viral/bacterial attacks. This could mean that cell cultures could be engineered with resistance.
Lab: CRISPR can be used to modify the genes of an organism by using cRNA, a process described in detail below.
Medical: CRISPR can be used as a medicine to target specific viruses or bacteria. It can also be a one use treatment for genetic or hereditary disorder.

WARNING: Technical portion coming up, some information may be inaccurate. If you wish to skip this, scroll down to the TL;DR for a summary.

CRISPR has already been used to revert a condition in mice, FAH deficiency, which also occurs in humans in the same mutation. This FAH is an enzyme, fullform fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase, that is the fifth in a series of five enzymes that breaks down the amino acid tyrosine. Tyrosine is common in many foods, and one of its byproducts known as fumarylacetoacetate is broken down in the FAH enzyme into acetoacetate and fumarate, through hydrolysis.

This behaviour is regulated through the FAH gene, and when one of 86 identified (and possibly even more, unknown ones) mutations occur, tyrosinemia type I can occur. The altered gene produces a faulty enzyme, either unstable or inactive, leading to minimal FAH enzyme activity. The most common one disrupts enzyme production instructions, leading to shorter enzymes.

Without enough FAH activity, a buildup of fumarylacetoacetate occurs in the liver and kidneys, of which high enough levels are thought to be toxic.

Meanwhile, tyrosinemia type 1 leads to generalized aminoaciduria in most cases (abnormal levels of amino acids in urine), hepatic failure in some, as well as other symptoms. But how does this relate to the mice in the experiment?

It doesn’t much, but you know, at least you learned something new. That is the disease the mice being experimented on had and was the one being treated.

In order for CRISPR Cas-9 nuclease enabled genome editing to work as intended, there has to be a guide RNA to tell the system what to target. The researchers did this by cloning three segments of mutated FAH genes that caused tyrosinemia type 1, labeled FAH 1, 2, and 3.

This, along with three other different injections, were prepared and injected into the mice:
  1. Saline
  2. A ssDNA oligo (single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide)
  3. ssDNA oligo plus pX330 that had an empty, unguided Cas9 (no sgRNA)
  4. The mentioned one, ssDNA oligo plus pX330 with Cas9 and a sgRNA(FAH1-3)
(pX330 is a plasmid that is also the root of a gene promoter, something that begins transcription of a particular gene. Couldn’t find much info on this matter, and I’m no biologist either. Oh, and saline is simply a mixture of sodium chloride in water. Kind of like a placebo, but with actual uses.)

SO, there were four sets of mice, and they all exhibited different effects. Mice with injection 1., 2., and 3. all lost 20% of their body weight and had to be culled (ah, the horror!). These were all kept without NTBC containing water, NTBC being 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)- 1,3-cyclohexanedione. This is something that preserves and protects the liver from acute injury.

Mice with FAH-2 didn’t lose weight, and in mice with FAH-1 or -3 there was a weight loss of less than 20 after 30 days. This was also without NTBC water. They then were put on NTBC water for 7 days, and then on withdrawal for 28 days. Upon doing so, they regained the weight they initially lost.

Those with FAH-2 treatment had ‘substantially’ less liver damage than untreated mice, shown through liver histology.

TL;DR: CRISPR works, reduced liver damage in mice.

That technical bit should have given you a decent idea on how CRISPR Cas9 enabled genetic editing works. Here’s a better, concise description:

  1. sgRNA binds to the matching strand of DNA.
  2. Cas9 enzyme in turn binds to the sgRNA
  3. Cas9 cut both strands of DNA but not sgRNA
  4. Done. The cut is attempted to be repaired with a mutation. Then, you can insert desired genetic code.

That's basically the CRISPR immune system, and the gene editing it can result in explained in simple terms.

WORKS CITED


Friday, September 15, 2017

Quarks

Water comprises around 71% of the earth's surface. That’s common knowledge. Each water molecule is made of 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen atom. Well, each of those atoms are made of smaller particles known as protons, neutrons, and electrons. What? Middle school chemistry?
But there's more to atoms than just those three particles. Each of those particles is comprised of smaller particles known as quarks.

Now a brief history. The idea of a quark was suggested around the same time by two separate scientists: Murray Gellman and George Zweig in 1964. This was toyed with and tentatively accepted as there was no evidence for their existence for a while.

First there were three proposed quarks hence the name quark; in a certain book Finnegan's Wake written by James Joyce, there is a passage "three quarks for muster mark".

In the same year (1964) Sheldon Glashow and James Bjorken coin the name for the fourth quark (charm).
In 1977, Leon Lederman and crew at Fermilab discover bottom quark, and theorize for its partner, top quark.

In 1995, that theory of top quark is validated when a heavy top quark is found.

Quarks are somewhat unique in that they have fractional charges.
What's a charge?
A charge is a positive, negative or neutral property of an atom, dictated by its reactions when exposed to an electromagnetic field. Note that the charge of 1 assigned to protons is just an arbitrary number created as a point of reference.

WARNING: (Some) Repeated Information Ahead
Well, quarks have fractional charges. Currently there are six known quarks: up, down, strange, charmed, bottom, and top.
Up and down were suggested at the same time, and are named such for their spin.

These are the two naturally occurring quarks. Up quarks have a charge of 2/3rds, and down -1/3rd; and together they compose all of the building blocks of matter.
Protons are built up of two up quarks and one down quark, electrons are three down quarks, and neutrons are an up quark and two down quarks.
This addition and subtraction keeps those arbitrary charge numbers the way they were before, while adding a new concept to physics.
Also part of the first batch of quarks, strange quarks are named after their strange property of surviving much longer than normal quarks.
Charm quarks are named after how charmed the scientists were at how well they fit in to the standard model.
These two quarks have the same charges as up and down: charm with +2/3rds and strange with -1/3rd.
Top and bottom get their names from their charge as well: they mirror up and down quarks with parallel charges. Top has a charge of +2/3rds and bottom -1/3rd.
The top quark is the most massive, and thus, in its short lifespan of 5 * 10^-25 seconds, it can't hadronize, meaning it won't form hadrons (baryons (3 quarks) and mesons (quark and antiquark)).
Bottom quarks are interesting as they are almost always products in top quark decays.
So you could say (as it is said) there are three "generations" of quarks: 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. The latter two all eventually decay into the first.
But what's with these quarks? What is their purpose?
Well, electrons were found to mysteriously bounce off of protons. This was in fact due to the quarks inside of the proton deflecting the electron.

You are probably wondering by now, “How do these quarks stick together? Planets are held together by gravity, molecules by ionic or covalent bonds. So… what about the quarks in atoms?”

Quarks are bound to each other with gluons. Think of it as quarks are glued together.

Actually, scrap that: that’s not how they work. But it’s good to remember it that way. Inside of a hadron, there are gluons as well as quarks. Each quark exchanges its gluons with another quark. This is what causes them to bond together.

So, quarks and gluons are found in atoms. As far as we know, these are the smallest bits of matter out there, but there could be smaller.

Quarks make up everything out there, and though we think we know a lot, we really don’t. For instance, the recently discovered exotic hadrons (2014) break our current rules of quarks and the quark model. But it’s up to us to complete the model for better understanding, and with that we have a lot of work to do.

Sources:


Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Total Eclipse Temperature Data

Hiya folks! Haven’t written in a bit!

Everyone knows about the eclipse that occurred. Many know how mesmerizing the sight of an eclipse is. Many don’t know about the scientific boon that an eclipse is, however. The effect of an eclipse on the temperature is one of the measurable effects of an eclipse done readily at home. Before starting to talk about data, key terms should be discussed.


Temperature: “The measured amount of heat in a place or a body” (Cambridge Dictionary)
To measure temperature, you use a thermometer. Some issues with thermometers are that they increase and affect their environment temperature, but this is negligible if not in subatomic levels.


Relative Humidity: Relative humidity is the ratio of absolute humidity compared to the maximum possible humidity. Absolute humidity is the mass of water vapour over the mass of dry air at a given time and temperature. The maximum possible humidity is dependent on the temperature. Humidity is generally measured in gm/m3.


Dew point: Dew point is the temperature at which the current amount of moisture will saturate the air. As the relative humidity increases, the dew point decreases. An example of this relationship is shown below:
DATA:
Equipment:
For the experiment, we used an Extech RHT10 USB Datalogger (Details at the end). It was basically rubber banded onto a pole, in the shadow of a tree.
The Datalogger (referred hereafter as the Extech) was set to record data every five seconds, and initially set for 8000 samples. 8000 samples would require staying way after the eclipse, so it was ended early, but data was still claimed: a whopping 4594 points.
Times:
The eclipse (in local time) was:
Start: 12:01:59.0
Start of total: 13:30:49.7
Maximum eclipse: 13:32:00.6
End of total: 13:33:11.3
End: 14:57:08.2
Location:
In case it matters, the location for measuring was (roughly) 35* 39’ 20.11” N, 85* 21’ 24.43” W, at Fall Creek Falls State Park, Tennessee. True, it wasn’t an ideal location but it was quite empty, so was great for a viewing ground. Look at the handy data below.
The experiment was conducted in the shade, under a tree in order to prevent the sun from heating up the gauge too much. This doesn’t affect the data too much, because, after all, it’s still a relative drop in temperature and humidity.
Actual Data:
Instead of listing all 4000 and some data points, I’m listing the averages of important groups and specific data (all data linked at bottom).
The average of the first hour was 82.65 degrees, second was 85.25, third was 84.9. After these the eclipse began. These were the three hours of 8:47:42-11:47:42. The first hour to second hour increase was due to the natural warming of the day, and the drop from second to third was due to a cloud. Annoying cloud, worried all the eclipse viewers.
At the beginning of the eclipse (rounded up as it didn’t fall exactly with the measurement cycle) the temperature was 82.78 degrees. The averages of the ten minutes after were 86.71, 88.4, 88.25, 86.1, 85.21, 84.9, 82.65. That was from minutes 0-80 of the eclipse. The next even interval is five minutes after, 85 minutes in, with a temperature of 81.1. The totality began 87 minutes in, and the temperature then was 80.49.

The totality had another drop in temperature. This data is averaging five measurements, starting from total till end. The data is as follows: 80.2, 80.2, 80, 79.93 and 79.8. The data after the eclipse is (in ten minute averages) 79.0, 78.99, 79.77, 80.25, 82.4, 85.5, 88, 88.6, and then 82.5 minutes in for 89.5 and at 84 minutes 89.9. The final two were at that weird offset due to the eclipse having ended.

So the temperature went down! This (to the right, graph 1) is the graph of the temperature change during the eclipse from start to finish in temperature. The jump up was due to a cloud.

The peak temperature (excluding end) was around 1/5th of the way in nearly matches the end temperature of the eclipse.
The next graph includes data before and after the eclipse. This is ten minutes before and after (only data I have for after :p)

As you can see to the left, the graph is much the same, but the peaks and drop are apparent. This reduction, however, may seem like a lot on the graph, but is just an 11 degree drop. This is, of course, Fahrenheit, and not Celsius. I only wish, but I set the Extech to Fahrenheit (sadly). In the graph (through the magic of Excel) the 1-2017 or 2143 is the reading number. The 1 is where the readings for that graph start, with each reading having a five second interval before the other.
This graph doesn’t show the relative humidity and dew point information, however.
Okay. To reiterate, relative humidity is the percent that the air is saturated compared to its maximum possible saturation at the temperature. It has no real purpose but is an indicator of both temperature and moisture. It can be used to predict the weather (obvious reasons), and the higher it is, the higher the moisture in the air.


When does it spike? That happens when clouds are near, or some event happens to interfere with the normal weather, like an eclipse. The eclipse did manage to raise the relative humidity, but as you can see in the next graph, it occurred while the temperature was regaining from its drop. The graph here (below) is the one showing only the eclipse, not before. In it, the Y axis to the left is temperature and the Y axis to the right is relative humidity. As you can see, the relative humidity peaked a bit after the temperature’s own divet. This could have been the Extech, but the increase in relative humidity is supported by prior studies (PMC).


The relative humidity peaked at 77.4% at 14:09:12 (2:09:12). There is another peak visible on the graph. It is due to a cloud (the same one), and actually comes in handy here as it shows how other objects change the relative humidity. The cloud did alter it, but the RH was still greater during eclipse.


I haven’t mentioned the temperature peak, or rather where it was the lowest. This was a 78.8, and it happened at 13:39:37 (1:39:37), 30 minutes before the humidity peak. This is slightly cooler than the air before (slightly from the view of stones and such), but for us, means a lot: ~10 degrees below the highest average temperature.
Of course, who could forget the official Extech generated graph! The one they make is interactive, meaning you can zoom into parts of it, but the one below is all the data.


This is the first of two parts, the second dealing with the corona of the sun. Expect that up some time soon. And, if you are here for the eclipse pictures, here: some photos taken at home (yes, from home and not the internet):



You can see the corona in those!

Sources:
See also:
Extech RHT10 USB Datalogger info: http://www.extech.com/display/?id=14707 (if you want to buy this, Fry’s electronics was selling one a bit cheaper than retail price. Just saying)


Sunday, June 18, 2017

Memory

Memory


This was a post I started to write the minute I finished the Alzheimer's post, and I wasn't too pleased with it. I just got round to posting it. Try and enjoy!

Many people believe that memory is a rapid storing of information like you hitting CTRL + S to save an image to your computer, and recalling is like opening it from your file explorer. (Sorry, I hate Macs)

The truth is, it’s complex. It’s like when you try to move your mouth. It seems like one fluid motion, but in reality is 43 muscles working in conjunction. This is how your brain does it, through a process often called distributed processing.

Currently, the leading neuroscientists believe that memory is a series of complicated actions done by your brain. Basically, each memory is divvied up into several parts, such as speech, sights, sounds, sensory emotions, and such. Each part of your brain responsible for that action then encodes the parts they receive and store it for later reference.

So, imagine you are trying to remember sitting on a beach chair. Everything you see, namely the sea, (or ocean you specific people), part of your legs, hopefully some sand, some other people unless it’s winter, and the sky will be saved in your visual cortex, the people talking around you will be stored in your language areas, and such for temperature and feelings.

While recalling this information, you access that encoded data and decode it to reform that memory. That is the basic principle behind memory: instead of a file cabinet, it’s a torrent system.

Why? Well, say you want to remember stuff, but half of your brain is sliced off. Would you like to remember half of your memories or all of them just with less detail? Ignore the fact that you would die if half of your brain was cleaved off.

But wait! There’s more! There is more than a single kind of memory! There are explicit, implicit, episodic, semantic, retrospective, prospective, and short term memory.

Explicit (declarative) memory is where you consciously recall the information. It isn’t subconscious like implicit (procedural). Explicit is generally for facts, or things that can be stored and retrieved at will. An example would be knowing where the struts are on a guitar. You consciously recall that information.

Implicit memory would be like just knowing how to play the guitar itself because you’ve done it before. It’s also known as procedural due to it strengthening through repetition, known in general as LTP (long term potentiation).

Explicit memory can be divided into two types: episodic and semantic. Episodic memories are specific events from your own past, such as places you’ve been to.

Semantic is a memory that you acquire throughout your life. It may have had a personal context earlier, but now is just a placeholder for knowledge.

Semantic memory derives from episodic memory, while episodic supports semantic. The main difference is that semantic mainly occurs in the frontal and temporal cortexes, whilst episodic is mostly centered in the hippocampus, and stored in the neocortex.

Memories are scattered through the brain as stated, and are all retrieved to form an episode in the hippocampus.

An interesting subset of memory is something known as “flashbulb memory”, a memory of a particular event and its details, of an event that is particularly surprising or upsetting. These are speculated to be highly resistant to being forgotten, possibly due to the strong emotions associated with them.

Memory is important in our complex, crazy life. Without it, we wouldn't have anything we take for granted (except the earth).

science.howstuffworks.com