Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Alzheimer's Disease

Seems like I've been forgetting the blog. Well, Alzheimer's disease this week. Concise sources this time.

Alzheimer’s is a serious disease affecting 44 million people in the world. Though not from birth, it is typically considered worse than other lifelong diseases. It strikes late in life, but takes its toll: the disease is a progressive destruction of brain cells responsible for memory and important mental functions.

In the beginning the disease may seem to be a small matter, leading to people forgetting childhood memories, but can quickly escalate into forgetting loved ones or having massive personality shifts.

Asides from the memory loss aspect, Alzheimer's is also the most common cause of dementia. Dementia is an extension of what Alzheimer’s does: it’s a collective group of brain disorders causing loss of intelligence and a sheer drop in social skills.

The fact that only 1 in 4 cases are diagnosed makes the disease worse. What does this disease do?
It creates a plethora of problems for those affected, such as increasingly worse memory lapses leading to misplacing items, forgetting conversations, repeating statements, and forgetting family members.

Alzheimer’s can cause difficulty in concentrating and thinking, especially with math. Though it's not like math is ever without difficulty for the common folk. Multitasking becomes difficult and finance, bills, and checkbook managing becomes hard. The cause of these last few disabilities may be due to the decrease in mathematical skills by the disease.

Responses to ‘normal’ problems becomes a problem, and planning becomes an issue as well. As the disease progresses, people may begin to forget basic tasks such as dressing and bathing. FOr now, let’s forget that once those two things were unessential.

The disease can also lead to changes in emotions, leading to depression, apathy, mood swings, often changes in sleeping habits, and delusions. Alzheimer’s works backwards from modern memories in its path of destruction, and so abilities gained early in life are protected until the later ends of disease progression.

In its last stages, it can lead to additional unrelated health problems such as aspiration (inhaling food or liquid into lungs), pneumonia, fractures, malnutrition or dehydration, and issues in balance and bower control.

Alzheimer’s patients require extensive care as well, and an estimated $605 billion are spent yearly for Alzheimer’s patients, equivalent to 1% of the world GDP.

Currently, scientists believe that Alzheimer’s is a combination of three factors: genetic, lifestyle, and environmental. This is most of the time, applying to the majority (95%) of people, as there are some purely genetic causes.

The effect of the disease is clear, it damages connections in the brain that are responsible for memory.  Memory works by creating bonds in your brain. When your brain receives constant messages the information is stored through a process called long-term potentiation (LTP). The strength of the memory created is determined through the amount of times the neuron recording the memory is bombarded with the same neurotransmitter signal.

A memory will be stronger the more signals you have to remember it. Alzheimer’s damages the connections created through the brain remembering stuff. The brain will eventually have much less connections and healthy brain cells.

Ooh, should have done memory before this. Well, that’s next!

As disease progression reaches a peak, more brain cells die, and leads to significant brain shrinkage. Doctors examining Alzheimer’s brain tissue under a microscope, they see two abnormalities characteristic of Alzheimer’s: plaques and tangles.

Run! Or just go to a doctor. Your teeth and hair have begun to invade your brain!

No, plaques are proteins, not bacteria. They are, according to the Mayo Clinic, ‘clumps of a protein called beta-amyloid (that) may damage and destroy brain cells in several ways, including interfering with cell-to-cell communication.’ This could be a cause of memory weakening.

Also, tangles aren’t like hair tangles in a literal sense, except they are. A protein called tau is necessary for internal support and a transport system to carry nutrients through long extensions in the brain. Tangles occur when the threads of tau twist into abnormal tangles in brain cells, leading to the failure of the transport system. This is a major factor in the death of brain cells.

Are there trends in Alzheimer’s diagnosis? Surprisingly, yes!

There are some risk factors, including but not limited to age, genetics, lineage, gender, lifestyle, location, and social engagement.

Age is the greatest risk factor for Alzheimer’s. Though not part of the normal ageing cycle, your risk increases significantly over 65. The rate of dementia basically doubles every decade after 60.

Genetics can lead to early onset Alzheimer’s as early as 30, but genetic studies show that your risk for Alzheimer’s is considerably higher if your first degree relatives have the disease. There are rare mutations in three genes that almost guarantee Alzheimer’s, though this accounts for less that 5% of diagnosed people.

The gene mutation leading to the highest risk for Alzheimer’s is apolipoprotein e4 (APoE4). If a patient has this mutation, his child has a 50/50 chance for receiving it and thus having a high risk of ALzheimer’s.

People with Down Syndrome have a high chance of developing the disease. In their case, the symptoms appear earlier: up to 20 years earlier than the general population.

Women have a slightly higher chance of developing Alzheimer’s partly due to life expectancy.

Those with mild cognitive impairment have memory problems as expected for age, but not classified as dementia. However, people with MCI do have a higher chance of being diagnosed with dementia later on.

Also, people with past head trauma have a higher risk of Alzheimer’s. Lack of exercise, obesity, high blood pressure and cholesterol and smoking can all increase your chance of developing Alzheimer’s.

Location seemes to have a difference in concentration: the disease is most common in Western Europe, and is least prevalent in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The major question is, “is there a cure, my knowledged doctors?” Well, they are working on it.

Here enters Antioquia, the largest concentration of people carrying the Apolipoprotein e4 mutation in the world.

A family here, headed by mother Cecilia and seven children and many grandchildren lost their patriarch, Alonso to Alzheimer’s. He carries the APoE4 switch, and has been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. His family acts as his caregiver.

When he first began to show signs of memory loss, the doctor suggested exercise and vitamins, but his condition didn’t get better.

He knew what was going on, and asked about why his memory was dying. His family has a high chance of Alzheimer’s, and wish to know what causes it.

The Banner Alzheimer’s Institute wanted to try removing amyloids from the brain to prevent Alzheimer’s, but they couldn’t tell for certain if someone had the disease or not. This was a crucial piece of information because they believed that if you administered the medicine too late, when Alzheimer’s had already begun, it would have no effect.

They went to Ken Kosik, a man who had been studying the family in Antioquia for fifteen years. They wanted to try their medicine and prevent the disease.

They started a double-blind study: 300 people in total; 200 with Alzheimer’s guaranteed and 100 without. Half the people with the mutation will receive medicine and the other half harmless placebo. This method was meant to ensure that nobody participating in the study would know their condition of the disease.

The participants would check in every two weeks for five years, in order to see if the people with the medicine will have less amyloid buildup than those with the placebo.

This is an ongoing study, and is expected to run till 2021. This is just the start, though, as if this doesn’t work it means something else will have to be targeted in the body.

There are two drugs that are made to manage the symptoms of Alzheimer’s, if not prevent: cholinesterase inhibitors, and memantine (namenda).

Cholinesterase inhibitors work by boosting levels of a neurotransmitter that is depleted in Alzheimer’s, in order to increase cell-to-cell communication. This improvement is modest, but can also treat agitation and depression.

Memantine slows the progression of moderate to severe Alzheimer’s in another brain cell communication network.

The two are often paired together to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s, but it isn’t a cure, and the progression is inevitable.

Currently, 1 in 3 seniors die with Alzheimer’s, and this disease is on an unstoppable rampage. Perhaps the future generation will solve the problem. But for now, the disease is here to stay, and knowledge of it will help those afflicted.



CBS documentary series 60 Minutes episode The Alzheimer’s Laboratory (Nov. 27 2016)

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Here's a short post today: but another one is due.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a property of particles suggested by Werner Heisenberg in 1927. Since subatomic particles are also waves, as stated by quantum mechanics, properties are unstable. In general understanding, particles can only occupy one location at a time, whereas waves are spread out across a distance.

Then, with particle-wave duality being a given, the same particle has both a definite location and a spread out area. It is in this conundrum that the uncertainty principle forms: it states that the more certain you are of a particle’s location, the less certain you are of the speed and vice versa.

This can be imagined simply. Think of an atom. This atom is moving through space and has a speed that you know for certain. The issue is, if you know the speed, you know one of the properties of a wave. This means that the particle is anywhere on the path of the wave.

This goes in the other direction too. Say you want to know the exact location, and you know the speed. To get the location, you substitute in another speed and overlap the two waves. Keep doing this with different speeds and you have a wave with tons of interference, both constructive and destructive, that can be parsed through to receive flat portions with minimal chance of the particle and areas of high crest and trough concentration with a higher chance of having the particle. Sure, you now know the location of the particle, but you lost certainty of the speed.

This is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, a puzzling statement in physics.
As I said, this is too short for pleasing audiences, another post is due soon.

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Time Travel

I haven't posted anything in 20 days... I sure wish I could travel back in time and change that. Yah, I could change the date, but whatever.

Working on the pictures. Expect them in the future.

Time travel is one of the most enticing alleys for discovery for scientists: with good reason. It would mean being an observer in events past, for, what trumps learning history other than experiencing it? Who wouldn’t want to observe the space launches, the construction of Alexandria, the hoisting of Big Ben into its tower, the famous battles fought between the Greeks and Romans.

Sadly, this hasn't happened yet, and probably won't. This will discuss the path to time travel, the way it would work and does work.

So, first I’ll tell you what time travel is. It's quite a logical explanation, it's traveling through time. But to understand this, you must understand that time is as much a dimension as any other, it is the fourth dimension. You travel through it back and forth, but mostly the forth, as you travel through the three dimensions of space.

For example, right now, you are going forward in time. This may not be exceptionally amazing, but still, it's true. That's one way right there, move fast.

Light cones.
I tried to explain these in about three ways so far, which you won't see because I probably won't upload them, but here goes. What a light cone is is the light coming in from the past to you and the light going into the future from you. These are called past and future cones respectively.
The boundaries of the cone, that is to say the slope of the cone, is a constant determined by the speed of light in a vacuum, hence the name light cone.

Now, you are always traveling through the cones, and they always update to resolve for that, kind of like automatic updates for Microsoft but not nearly as annoying. The center where they meet is called the singularity. Just kidding, this isn't black holes. At least not yet. The center is the current moment in time for whatever is being represented.

You can travel into the future within the limits of the future cone. That is why the slope is the speed of light. You theoretically cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Now, in a 2D version of the cone, let's imagine a grid. In order to maintain my professionalism, I shall draw these out by hand.

Looking at the image, you can see three points in or on the future light cone. They all fall differently on the distance axis of X. The ones further away from the center line of stability means that the moment is further away in distance. Now, since the Y values of time are all the same, those that are further away require a faster speed to reach them at the same time. Since point 3 is twice as far away as point 1, you have to travel at twice the speed to reach the same spot at the same time.

Nothing can travel faster than light, so the boundaries of the cone are the universe preventing meltdown of the fundamental laws of nature. Slight exaggeration, that's just an ‘artist’s depiction’ of events.

These are the limits of time travel. This also means you can't go so fast you travel into the past. How'dya do this? Simple.

Exploit black holes. What do you mean we can't? Haven't humans exploited everything else? Why not black holes?

The way to possibly travel through time would be by exploiting their time bending properties. Black holes have the well known ability of bending light towards them, but also have a unique property of bending future and past cones till they reach a stasis. Of course, this has to happen when you are almost overlapping the singularity of the black hole. Can't the universe make anything easy?

A singularity, for the single variety of people with little to none knowledge of the stars, is an infinitely dense and infinitely small point at the center of a black hole. When you approach it, you can't escape. Nothing can escape. Not light, not sound (you're in space, no one hears your screams), not even Houdini. Simply put, it's the perfect prison if you don't expect to see your prisoner again.

The point is, if you can approach the black hole and go further you could essentially turn your cones 180° instead of 90°. This would mean you traveling into the future would travel you back in time. Great!

But no, this couldn't happen.

At least not yet, as we don't know how to a) go into a black hole and survive and b) how to go further in a black hole.

There's another way, incorporating the phenomenon known as time dilation. Time dilation is the thing that occurs to astronauts floating about in space in the wee hours of the morning at Antarctica and waving at the sleeping scientists while spacewalking. It's why they are slightly older than the people on earth.

Ever heard of it?

Probably not, it's quite obscure and as far as I know not taught as common core education. Time dilation is how objects age less the faster they travel. There's a whole formula dedicated to this:

t = t0/(1-v2/c2)1/2

In this, the t is time observed from other reference frame, the t0 is time in observer’s reference, the v is the speed of the object and c is the speed of light in a vacuum.

What does this mean? Well, time is a concept that is extremely relative: it varies on the observer (just like physics. Expect something on physics soon).

So, the t is the time from someone else's point of view and the t0 is the is the time from the point of view of the traveler. The speed is quite obvious, but here's to you spoon fed people. The speed v is how fast you travel. C? Oh, that's the speed of light in a vacuum.

This phenomenon is the reason clocks run faster in space and is an effect of the
Special Theory of Relativity.

Without getting into the detailed, specific, boring sciences of it, it basically states that an object will age less relative to another object if it travels faster than the relative object.


The speed of the object is shown as a percentage out of the speed of light here to make calculation much easier. An example would be if you plugged in .95 as your percentage for speed, with C staying 299,792,458 even though you can plug it in as (.95c)2 and cancel out the c’s. The observer time is 10 years. This gives:

t = 10/(1- (.95c)2/c2)1/2

t = 10/(1- .952)1/2

t = 10/ .312

t = 32 years


Yah, I pulled it off the website in the sources. If you protest I will change it.
Whatever.

Plugging it in gives a value of 32. This means that if an observer traveled for ten of his or her years at 95% of the speed of light, those around him on earth not traveling at that pace will have aged 32 years.

There is a trend in this data. The function itself is an exponential function. The slope becomes steeper the closer that your speed is to the speed of light. So, you age less the faster you move. For example, this image:

The apparent time dilation appears between the .3 and .4 percent marks of the speed of light.

Time dilation, however, requires you to travel ridiculously fast. This could probably be done soon but humans probably couldn't handle the speeds.

Ignore the obvious for now. This is a way to travel into the future. You can pair this with a method of hypothetical space travel to travel into the past.

What hypothetical method of space travel is there? There’s only one one could name: wormholes.

(Cue dramatic dun-dun-dun music)

Nah, wormholes are portals between two points in space held together by tons of energy. Not as exiting but much more useful. See what I did there?

Wormholes can be imagined by a simple exercise. Take a piece of paper and draw an A on one side of the paper and a B on the other. There are many ways to get from one side to another, but the quickest would be folding the paper in half to overlap the two points and then cut a hole through them. Unless you can teleport. If so sorry for wasting your time. Why don't you teleport into the past to avoid reading this.

Well, wormholes are what I said: a merger between two points in space to get to another place quicker. So, the issue that wormholes create is that they require extensive energy to hold up. Oh, they're theoretical. They were originally suggested by Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen, and called Einstein-Rosen Bridges.

Say they can exist without collapsing immediately, they aren't at the currently predicted size of 10-33 centimeters, they are stable, and you don't die when you enter it, the wormhole would be able to transport people through connected space.

Now, I said extensive energy, but it's more like exotic matter. Think about it this way. If you have a bird garden and a new one opened up with more birds than you, to keep your business afloat, you need more exotic birds. In other words, more exotic (birds) matter, and hold your business up.

Don't confuse exotic matter with antimatter or dark matter. Exotic matter is matter that contains a negative density of energy and a large negative pressure. This type of matter has only been seen in the behaviours of certain vacuum states, and only exists as part of quantum field theory.

If a wormhole had enough of this exotic matter it would theoretically be able to transport humans. Of course the introduction of normal matter could lead to a collapse of the wormhole, but ignore that for now.

Remember we talked about time dilation? Well, pair it with wormholes! Say you manage to set up a wormhole. This is linked to a spacecraft. You set the spacecraft traveling at 95% of the speed of light for ten years. The wormhole would age ten years, but due to time dilation the other wormhole located on earth would age thirty-two years. Sweet, right?

Do you not get what it means? Well, if the scientist from earth travels through the wormhole without its obvious collapse, he would be effectively traveling into the past. He would be going back 12 years into the past as the wormhole would be linking two points in space-time not just space. This would mean that one could also go 12 years into the future if you go back through it.

Time travel has repercussions too, so it can't be taken lightly, but these are just the possibilities. It's not like they can be done right now, and it's not like they are all theoretically sound, but they could occur. The future is coming, and it demands the past.

For the first time in a while, going off of memory, some parts are based off of what I heard in professor Brian Cox’s Christmas lecture at the Institution “The Science of Doctor Who”.
http://hepweb.ucsd.edu/ph110b/110b_notes/node46.html
http://visualrelativity.com/LIGHTCONE/schwarzschild.html
https://www.quora.com/What-are-light-cones-of-an-event
http://www.phy.olemiss.edu/HEP/QuarkNet/time.html
http://www.space.com/20881-wormholes.html
http://www.space.com/21675-time-travel.html


Saturday, April 22, 2017

Evolution

This week the post is on evolution, the basics of biology! As a bonus you get a lesson on genetic inheritance!

A word most people even slightly educated know about and dreaded from school. It is the proposition made by the controversial 1859 theory of natural selection (well, other than natural selection itself). Charles Darwin was the man who we believe suggested this idea, doing many things in the process: the two main points being the revolution in biology that it sparked, and the torture school children must go through.

Darwin proposed that all species of life evolved from a common ancestor. He said this occurred through a process he dubbed as ‘natural selection’.

A population is “a community of organisms of the same species that is able to interbreed freely”. One of the fundamental facts to understand is that even in a population, the probability that the genome of two different organisms will be the same is infinitesimally small. When I mention genome, I mean the genetic makeup of an organism. This will be discussed in the future, but a basic overview is this: there is something called deoxyribonucleic acid or more commonly known as DNA that makes up the pattern for all living organisms.

The study of DNA is essentially genetics, and the makeup of the DNA varies from species to species. An organism defined as a different species from another will have different traits, whether observable or unobservable. These are passed down from mother to child, and in the process of child development, if a mutation occurs in the DNA, some small part of the offspring will be different. This is genetic variation and always occurs.

Over time, however, the genetic differences begin to drive a species further and further away from its original ancestor. This is where the theory of natural selection, or evolution, comes into play. Now, in a population, the “collective variation” is the gene pool. The gene pool is the sum of all of the genes in the species, all of the ‘allelic’ forms. Allelic is a term referring to alleles: alleles are the bits of data transferred from parent to offspring.

The alleles passed down have a specific probability based on the genes of the two parents. Though I won’t get in-depth on alleles right now, I will talk about the basic transfer: how you calculate the basic probability.

How alleles work is there are two main types: dominant and recessive. Dominant alleles are, well, dominant, and recessive ones are, well, recessive. Dominant alleles are denoted with a capital letter for allele transfer, and recessive ones are denoted with lowercase letters.

In the simplified version I will show you, each parent has two alleles. For example, two parents could have Aa and aA.

Parents
A
a
a
Aa
aa
A
AA
Aa

The table above is the passing of alleles. In this example, imagine that this is overly simplified, and that a capital A is for black hair, and lowercase a is for auburn hair. Now, looking at the chart, the letter is passed down into both columns. One thing people don’t understand much is that if there is even a single dominant allele, the trait will always be the dominant one. So in this example, there are 3 diagrams with capital A’s (As? What would it be?), and all three would have black hair. For a recessive trait to come forward, the recessive allele must be repeated twice. This happens once, so the aa means auburn hair.

But what does this mean? you ask me. This means that a child has a 25% chance of getting each square, and adding up the 3 out of 4 chance for black hair, means one has 75% chance for black hair and 25% chance for auburn hair.

In the real world, there are thousands of alleles that are responsible for one trait. All the versions that exist are pooled together in an allelic pool. I hope you enjoyed that genetics lesson. Moving on.

Now, the gene pool is important in identifying the evolutionary change over time. One thing you must understand about populations: there will be genetic variation. ALWAYS, within a population, will there be variation.

Remember the alleles we discussed literally a minute ago? Well, they are responsible for mutation. The alleles are those that pass down traits, and invariably are those that pass down mutations. Mutations are the accidental changes in the gene patterns of a species.

This mutation is the direct cause of the gaining of traits in a population. These traits are consecutively inherited by future generations, and soon the trait becomes intertwined, synonymous with the species.

Migration between two populations can lead to genetic changes as well, as most populations have varying gene pools. You may be quoting me from earlier: ‘A population is “a community of organisms of the same species that is able to interbreed freely”.’ Double quotation marks.

I said “of the same species”. Now, you must realize that populations are only communities, not the only surviving little fragment group of a dying species. The same species can have different populations.

Now, not only does freak mutation lead to species change, so does the environment. The most famous case that proves the theory of natural selection is that of the peppered moth. I know I haven’t discussed the theory itself yet, all in due time.

The peppered moth is a species of moth that, in the 1800s in England, underwent a massive change. During that time was the industrial revolution: a time of environmental collapse when humans sought to be the most advanced species yet.

Back in that time, peppered moths were light, and dark patterned ones were rare. Then came the smog and smoke, leading to a change in moths. Normally, the lighter moths were the ones with the camouflage, but the smoke led to the darker moths surviving and passing down their genes.

This meant that the lighter moths began to become rarer and rarer till the variant no longer existed. The dark moth, on the other hand, became common. This is referred to as a prime example of natural selection.

What is natural selection? Natural selection is the theory suggested by Darwin. It essentially states that out of two species, whatever species is more outfitted to survive in specific conditions will survive. This is said to be nature’s method of selecting survivors, hence the name natural selection.

A better explanation is this: if there was an incoming ice age, and two types of squirrels are both being observed to note their species change, whichever one is more outfitted to the cold will survive. So, if squirrel species A, with wooly, wiry coats is compared with squirrel species B, with thin fur and desert-like heat retardant coat, squirrel species A would probably survive out of the two. Now, this isn’t very hard to work out on your own, as logically, the colder it is, you want to retain heat.

I really don’t know if heat retardant is the right word, but retardant doesn’t mean retaining, so the example stands firm. Also, the reason heat retardant was the property given was due to eggs being fried at Death Valley. Like, the squirrel is a mammal, I get it, probably won’t lay eggs soon, but what if the individual organism gets set on fire?

Natural selection could also happen in another way, other than natural selection, but by coincidence. Say there are three types of insects with different coloured shells, black, white and grey, with an equal 33% chance for all the colours The insects live on volcanic rock, obsidian, and they are parasitic. Of course humans want to kill them, because everything bad other than humans must go, right?

Well, the white ones are easy to see, so literally the entire population is demolished. The grey one is quite easy to spot but not as easy, as grey is the single tone of silver, whilst gray is the palette between black and white. Being in the middle, most can see it while some can’t, and around 75% are extinguished from existence. The black ones are hard to spot, and only about 25% are stopped from their parasitic habits.

The genes for the white shell is almost demolished and is rarely seen from then on. The grey shelled insects have smaller numbers but still exist, and the black ones are the same. However, the black ones only lost 25%, and the grey ones lost 75% of their population.

Working out a ratio leads to a 50/50 ratio for black to grey after the white is removed, and then taking out 25% of 50 and 75% of 50 leads to a ratio of 37.5 to 12.5.

Essentially, we take a new sample size of 100, with 50 black and 50 grey, and take out 25% and 75% respectively, giving a rounded version of 37 and 12. This adds up to 49, and leads to a 75.51% to 24.49%. This means an equal 33% to 33% to 33% percent lead to a big difference.

(Please check the math, it may be wrong)

Note the insect bit isn’t definitive fact, so don’t say that it doesn’t exist. Something like it has probably happened in the past before, however. This type of evolution is known as gene drift.

Another name for natural selection is the survival of the fittest, coined by Herbert Spencer, for reasons probably not worth mentioning, but here. The term survival of the fittest refers to how the so-called fittest species or members of a species will survive. Interestingly, this term was coined referencing an economic principle.

But what does fittest mean? Fittest means the ‘capability to pass down genes’, and can be mathematically be described through the ratios of viability (the lack of high infant mortality rates) and fertility (offspring:parents ratio).

Well, it’s all well and good, but if everything happening is its own form of natural selection, then what’s the use? To define the process, Darwin listed four rules:
  • Variation within traits in a population must exist, and some variation results in fitness.
  • There should be reproductive differences between species.
  • You must assume that genetic traits are inherited, leading to fitness being inherited too. In this case, the fitness refers to genetic variations like the different coloured shells of the volcanic insects we made an example of earlier.
  • Fitter individuals mate more often* so that means the fitter trait is passed down more and the weaker ones die out.
*(Darwin suggested this)

He goes on to say that unless all four conditions are met, natural selection won’t have been the contributor to evolutionary change.

There are, even within the one-of-many-branches evolution separate types: micro- and macro-evolution.
If you know your root words, or even better, study an ancient language like Latin, you know micro is small and macro is large. It doesn’t take a genius either.

Using this root word process you probably deduced correctly that microevolution is change on a small scale and macroevolution is change on a large scale.

Aren’t roots fun.

Microevolution is the change in a gene pool: the small mutation generated additions to the collective data of a population. These microevolutions could be caused by a variety of things ranging from the aforementioned gene drift to good old mutation to natural selections.

Now, macroevolutions are a step higher. These are evolutions leading to a whole new species: a branch off of the parent species. This is through a process cleverly named speciation. This is a pain to observe as it normally takes a long time, compared to the relatively quick microevolutions.

The process of macroevolution ties in with two different types: a type known as allopatric speciation: when a species branches off into two parts and speciation occurs; and a type known as sympatric: when the species evolves from a parent species while sharing a geographical area.

Perhaps the most famous example of natural selection and allopatric speciation is that of Darwin’s finches. No, not a bunch of birds Darwin owned and observed, a bunch of birds he probably wished he owned but did still observe.

Darwin, as a young man, sailed to the Galapagos, and observed a bunch of finches. They all were of similar genetic makeups, were defined as the same species, but had different beaks.




Look at the image to the left. It is the distribution of various finches throughout the visitor islands. You can probably notice that no finches are on all of the islands. This is due to the fact that the finch isn’t perfectly adapted to the island environment.

Now, the thing is, if it adapted to the other islands, a new species would still be created, so natural selection still works.

Back to allopatric speciation. The way this works is that two separate gene pools are established, each facing its own natural selection.

The things is, since the finches are still sharing the same area, the finch evolution falls under both allopatric and sympatric, but that’s beside the point.

What happened with the finches was that not all finches could find the same food on different islands, so some finches who had mutated to have stronger beaks to say crack nuts would do better on islands with nuts.

So, the finches who were better suited for life on a specific island have a higher chance of surviving on the island. Now, this is an example of allopatric speciation.

One thing that can happen is that the two populations created by allopatry? allopatric speciation haven’t yet become species, meaning that in the case that two populations meet up again, sympatric speciation can occur.

Now, if two allopatric species become sympatric, i.e. begin to share the land, three things can occur:
  1. The two populations, if not diverged much, could still merge back into one,
  2. The two populations could fight for resources and eventually lead to the extinction of one,
  3. Or the two populations could develop side by side and specialize in different areas.

The finch evolution is both allopatric and sympatric as looking at the chart, you can observe that two similar species don’t live on the same island. The cactus finches and large cactus finches simply don’t coexist due to their similar diets, leading to competition that, with the survival of the fittest doctrine, led to the most suitable to adaption surviving.

On the island of Genovesa, large ground finches and large cactus finches coexist. The important thing is, the beaks of large cactus finches are different on Genovesa than on their other island, Espanola. This is due to the fact that they have competition on the island of Genovesa.

Their competition is the large ground finch: and mostly, they coexist well; in the wet season, when there is a ton of food there is no worry, but in the dry season, the species must compete for the limited food. For that purpose, the species must specialize to get food. The thing is, there isn’t much of a difference between beaks as any cactus finch with variance from a ground finch won’t be able to compete with even it’s own or opposite species.

So, the species are sympatric as they share the same land, and since they are assumed to have evolved from the same root, the evolution is also allopatric.

The story is completely different on Espanola: there is no large ground finch, and the cactus ground finch is virtually alone with little competition.

This allows it to demonstrate variability that the other island’s finches cannot, and effectively will settle between the two of Genovesa. This will let it feed equally well all year round. This phenomenon is known as character displacement.

Darwin’s finches aren’t just scientific proof, remember, they were the ones who put Galapagos on the scientific radar. Give credit, most people can’t say the same about putting their home on the map.

Darwin’s theory may be the most accepted, and definitely the most well known, but it isn’t the only one. A theory known as punctuated equilibrium was suggested in 1972, challenging Darwin’s theory’s core.

Proposed by Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge, it states that species evolved rapidly over a short period of time known as a punctuation, and then rest in stasis, hence the name punctuated equilibrium.

This theory is based on the gaps from the fossil record, and says that any instance of selective evolution is coincidental.

Scientists have studied patterns and found some proof for the theory: namely that of bryozoans. They were a group of coral like sea organisms that lived some 140 million years ago and remained unchanged for around 40 million years till a burst of evolution and diversification, and then another period of rest.

If this is proven, the entirety of biology will be overturned, but in the end, it boils down to the fact that speciation led to most species.

Human evolution will be discussed on this blog later.

Sources
All of Science A book whose chief consultant is Associate Professor Allan R. Glanville. The front cover has a picture of a nautilus on it. Or a golden spiral, but it looks way too realistic. Then again, who knows what people do with photoshop and an hour of free time.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/07/04/death-valley-eggs_n_3545794.html Don’t believe me about the eggs? Check this.